Evidence that survives the review.
Operational resilience and energy-compliance regimes reward continuous, evidenced asset data — and punish the annual-consultant model. We structure the evidence so boards, auditors, and supervisors see the same numbers.
Critical operations → supporting assets
Banks and critical operators increasingly need to map critical operations to supporting assets — including third-party data-center infrastructure — and test resilience against severe-but-plausible scenarios. A screenshot-based evidence pack will not survive a review.
- Continuous evidenceCritical operations mapped to supporting assets — continuously, not annually.
- Scenario evidence packsSevere-but-plausible scenario tests, evidenced with live asset data.
- Tolerance monitoringImpact tolerances defined and monitored against real telemetry.
- Board-ready postureBoard-level attestation supported by an auditable event log.
Audits at asset depth
Energy-audit regimes are expanding into data centers. PUE trending, chiller efficiency, and cooling-water use become auditable line items — continuous data beats a one-off consultant sweep.
- PUE trendingPUE trending across the audit window — not a spot reading.
- Efficiency by assetChiller and CRAH efficiency by asset, mapped to load.
- Water & thermalCooling-water consumption and thermal-loop performance.
- Audit line itemsAutomatically generated audit line-item pack.
Local regimes. Same evidence layer.
May 2026 operational-resilience deadline for banks; September 2026 BEEO audits for Schedule 4 data centres. Deep guides, REA notes, and local CTAs live on the Hong Kong market site.
The method is portable. Market packs land as we open local practices — same asset model, regime-specific evidence mapping.
Talk to us about your market →Included in every reliability assessment. Fixed scope, four weeks.