Technical Hierarchy
ISO 14224 9-level equipment taxonomy sourced from P&IDs and SLDs. Clean asset boundaries for chillers, HV transformers, PDUs, CRAHs and CDUs.
Deep dive →One sequence, four stages, standards-aligned. It turns drawings and telemetry into the maintenance strategies, spares and evidence that keep AI-era halls running.
ISO 14224 9-level equipment taxonomy sourced from P&IDs and SLDs. Clean asset boundaries for chillers, HV transformers, PDUs, CRAHs and CDUs.
Deep dive →6-step facilitated ranking. Safety, Environment, Reputation, Financial. 5x4 matrix. Classes A-D map to strategy, standby, spares and RCA candidates.
Deep dive →RCM decision logic per SAE JA1011/1012. On-condition, scheduled, failure-finding, RTF or redesign — tuned to MTBF, cost and availability.
Deep dive →Strategies, spares, RCA candidates and KPIs written back into your CMMS. Between audit cycles, the loop keeps improving.
Standards trust line: ISO 14224 · ISO 55000 · NORSOK Z-008 · SAE JA1011/1012. Referencing these standards does not constitute certification.
Teams jump to FMEA on their top ten worries. Without a clean hierarchy and criticality baseline, the strategies float — they can't be maintained, audited or ported to a new CMMS.
Draw the hierarchy from the drawings. Rank criticality with the operator in the room. FMEA the class A/B assets first. Write it all back into the CMMS as living records.
Fixed scope, fixed fee. You leave with a baseline asset model, a FMEA-ranked risk register, and an evidence starter pack.