Step 01 · TH

Technical Hierarchy (ISO 14224).

A 9-level equipment taxonomy that turns your P&IDs, SLDs and vendor drawings into a queryable asset structure — the foundation for every downstream reliability decision.

What we produce

  • ·Site → System → Equipment Unit → Sub-unit → Component boundaries
  • ·Consistent tagging so CMMS, DCIM and EPMS can reconcile
  • ·Documented equipment boundaries (what is 'the chiller' vs 'the chilled-water plant')
  • ·Traceable back to the source drawing revision

Data-center examples

LevelChiller exampleHV transformer example
1 IndustryData CenterData Center
2 Business CategoryColocationColocation
3 InstallationTKO CampusTKO Campus
4 Plant/UnitChilled Water Plant A11kV Switch Room
5 Section/SystemPrimary loopHV distribution
6 Equipment UnitChiller CH-01Transformer TX-02
7 Sub-unitCompressorWindings
8 ComponentBearing setBushing
9 PartVibration sensorBuchholz relay

Why it matters for AI-era halls

New density and liquid-cooling assets (CDUs, manifolds, rear-door heat exchangers) are being bolted onto legacy hierarchies. Without a refresh, criticality and FMEA inherit the wrong parents — and energy-audit evidence for critical building services won't reconcile.

← Back to methodology

A reliability assessment scoped to one hall.

Fixed scope, fixed fee. You leave with a baseline asset model, a FMEA-ranked risk register, and an evidence starter pack.